La Veta, Colo. Aug. 23, 2008 – I made it to the ranch. Tumbleweeds and sunflowers are thick up my drive because the new drive was put in just a few months before I moved back up to Alaska. The local gravel company is terrible for having weed seeds mixed in with their rock, but the local officials grandfathered them in when it came time to require all suppliers to be weed free. Now I have a full day of pulling what I can, but then having to use 2-4-D heavy duty ranch weed killer to make sure the tumbleweeds don’t reseed. Don’t bother using Roundup (TM), that is just like watering the plants.
Last night I dropped by the house of some people I know in the area. Four of the five were staunch Hillary Clinton supporters. All were 65 or older, which immediately reminded my of the exit poll data indicating Clinton’s base was the 65-and-older crowd. Their “love” of Hillary has not abated and their disdain for Obama was obvious, but their reasoning was a bit week. I had announced myself as a journalist, but since the setting was not obviously a formal interview, I’ll leave their names out of this. Two of the people are born and raised and still live back east and the other two are transplants. All four people are white (I object to the term Caucasian, because it literally implies someone descended from the people who settled in the Caucasus Mountains near southwest Russia. My most dominant heritage is Swedish. Thus, I am white too.)
Here are some comments from the table with my opinions in parentheses:
“Obama won’t win Pennsylvania.”
“I’ll vote for McCain instead of voting for Obama.” (How does voting for McCain further the programs and causes of the Democratic Party?)
“Obama has done nothing for the current situation in Georgia.” (True, but what real progress has been made by the current administration? I replied to the table. Also, Obama said earlier in the year that foreign relations were the responsibility of the sitting president and candidates for the 2008 election should not be sending mixed signals from the WhiteHouse and State Department. Sen. Joe Biden, however, did address the issue this week as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.)
“Hillary is from this area.”
“Obama had to win the nomination, otherwise towns would have burned. If O.J. had been convicted, LA would have burned.” (True, there were riots over the Rodney King incident and people were hurt, but 1) the riots stopped and 2) the violence was, unfortunately, directed back on the same demographic that was protesting and up in arms – a nice way of saying black-on-black violence and white people really had no reason to fear for their personal safety.)
“Hillary was expected to bow out of the race gracefully and just walk away. White candidates were expected to just walk away, but a colored man wasn’t held to the same standard.” (Okay, now I’m starting to see the generational thing when they use the term “colored”. To me, this term labels these people as being from a different era who for some reason have a problem with the word “black”. It also shows an emphasis on the distinction of race in these people’s minds. Another thing is that Hillary did not bow out gracefully. Either she or her campaign team put up a good fight, but they also were slow to acknowledge the writing on the wall and played little games when the delegates were firmly in Obama’s favor. )
————————-
Okay, so that pretty much spells out the tone at the table. While not the only factor, these people clearly have some degree of race entering their thought process. Not all old people have these issues and I wouldn’t call what was being said out-and-out racism, but it is a stage where we are aware of and label people by the race. Let me repeat that these four people are not necessarily speaking for all senior citizens in this country.
I personally don’t see Barack as a black man. I forget his race at times. I really do. I see him as a man. Granted, I was happy to see that this year’s election will be different from the same old choosing between two old white guys. Let’s change up the lineup for a change. Whether it was having a woman or an African-American or a Hispanic candidate, change can be good for introduction of new perspectives and fresh ideas. It can also be good simply for change’s sake. I felt very proud of our country when we finally had a woman sworn in as Speaker of the House.
Race may always be with us. Things have improved – more for some than for others. Part of my extended family is a black woman in Louisiana with two children, a husband and her sister’s two children. Life is very difficult for them. The economic recovery did not come to their neighborhood. Is it because of their race? I’m not a social scientist, but part of me has to think that on the average, white people in this country come into this world with more and are given more advantages. We don’t know what it’s like to be of a different race or ethnicity.
So maybe Obama is a great thing for this country – especially because he is black (or half black or 25 percent or however you want to do the genetic math) or because he is not 100 percent white. In time, maybe all people will have the same opportunities in life even if they don’t start out on an equal footing. And if we help the disadvantaged to be less so, isn’t that good for an entire society?
I think so.